This essay is an excavation into what I call the “Anglo-Southern Relations” archive.” Specifically, it is a critical reading of some English travelogues, whose authors visited the Mezzogiorno during the second half of the 20th century. I will examine this archive in search of the meridionist gaze (Pfister, Cazzato) that has informed the relations between England and Italy since the 18th century. It is through this archive that modern Europe has constructed itself against the Mediterranean Other (European and non European). A propos of Orientalism and Islam, Spivak argues that “Orientalism equals racial profiling equals the demonization of Islam.” In the Italian context, the equation can be translated in this way: “Meridionism equals racial profiling equals the demonization of Southern Europeans as inner Arabs or Africans.” Therefore, my aim is to see how one of the main categories of the meridionist repertoire – islamophobia – is at work and whether the Mediterranean epistemology of crossroads (Braudel, Cassano, Chambers) may be a way out of the clash of fundamentalisms. Also, this sort of wall-archive could be evaded through the postcolonial (Young) and decolonial epistemology (Quijano, Mignolo), which may play a crucial role for the present migratory question and the deconstruction of “Fortress Europe,” whose cultural walls are being built by meridionist “bricklayers” at any latitude.
Dis/fare l'archivio islamofobico delle relazioni anglo-meridionali. Smurare il Mediterraneo
CAZZATO, Luigi Carmine
2016-01-01
Abstract
This essay is an excavation into what I call the “Anglo-Southern Relations” archive.” Specifically, it is a critical reading of some English travelogues, whose authors visited the Mezzogiorno during the second half of the 20th century. I will examine this archive in search of the meridionist gaze (Pfister, Cazzato) that has informed the relations between England and Italy since the 18th century. It is through this archive that modern Europe has constructed itself against the Mediterranean Other (European and non European). A propos of Orientalism and Islam, Spivak argues that “Orientalism equals racial profiling equals the demonization of Islam.” In the Italian context, the equation can be translated in this way: “Meridionism equals racial profiling equals the demonization of Southern Europeans as inner Arabs or Africans.” Therefore, my aim is to see how one of the main categories of the meridionist repertoire – islamophobia – is at work and whether the Mediterranean epistemology of crossroads (Braudel, Cassano, Chambers) may be a way out of the clash of fundamentalisms. Also, this sort of wall-archive could be evaded through the postcolonial (Young) and decolonial epistemology (Quijano, Mignolo), which may play a crucial role for the present migratory question and the deconstruction of “Fortress Europe,” whose cultural walls are being built by meridionist “bricklayers” at any latitude.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2016_FES_Dis:fare l'archivio islamofobico.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
454.41 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
454.41 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.