Background: Sequential therapy is one of the most common regimens for H. pylori eradication. The progressive ageing may lead to several problems in the management of H. pylori. Objective: We aimed to assess the effectiveness/safety of sequential therapy in elderly patients and evaluate possible predictive factors of failure. Methods: We retrospecively enrolled 76 patients >65 years old (elderly group) and 69 controls diagnosed of H. pylori by upper endoscopy/histology and a non-invasive test. Patients received 10-day sequential therapy (esomeprazole 40 mg and amoxicillin 1 g for the first 5 days followed by clarithromycin 500 mg plus tinidazole 500 mg, all b.i.d). Comparison between groups was carried out by t-test or 2 test where appropriate. Binomial logistic regression was used to determine factors influencing treatment failure. Results: Eradication was achieved, at Intention-To-Treat analysis, in the 78.9% and 75.4% in the elderly and control group, respectively, and, at Per-Protocol analysis, in the elderly patients in the 81.1% and in controls in the 76.5%, not statistically different. Both groups experienced a similar rate of side effects (27% vs 26.5% p = 1). At univariate analysis, treatment failure in the elderly group positively correlated with female sex (OR=22.5), side effects (OR=5.3), intestinal metaplasia (OR=6.7) and gastric atrophy (OR=6.8), while negatively with antritis (OR=0.15). However, at multivariate analysis, none of the cited variables was found statistically significant. Conclusion: Sequential therapy is safe in old patients and has satisfactory effectiveness, but an "a priori" model predicting the outcome based only on clinical data is not reliable.

Sequential therapy for helicobacter pylori in elderly patients: Effectiveness, safety and predictors of success

LOSURDO, GIUSEPPE;IANNONE, ANDREA;GIORGIO, FLORIANA;BARONE, Michele;PRINCIPI, MARIABEATRICE;IERARDI, Enzo Gianni;DI LEO, Alfredo
2017-01-01

Abstract

Background: Sequential therapy is one of the most common regimens for H. pylori eradication. The progressive ageing may lead to several problems in the management of H. pylori. Objective: We aimed to assess the effectiveness/safety of sequential therapy in elderly patients and evaluate possible predictive factors of failure. Methods: We retrospecively enrolled 76 patients >65 years old (elderly group) and 69 controls diagnosed of H. pylori by upper endoscopy/histology and a non-invasive test. Patients received 10-day sequential therapy (esomeprazole 40 mg and amoxicillin 1 g for the first 5 days followed by clarithromycin 500 mg plus tinidazole 500 mg, all b.i.d). Comparison between groups was carried out by t-test or 2 test where appropriate. Binomial logistic regression was used to determine factors influencing treatment failure. Results: Eradication was achieved, at Intention-To-Treat analysis, in the 78.9% and 75.4% in the elderly and control group, respectively, and, at Per-Protocol analysis, in the elderly patients in the 81.1% and in controls in the 76.5%, not statistically different. Both groups experienced a similar rate of side effects (27% vs 26.5% p = 1). At univariate analysis, treatment failure in the elderly group positively correlated with female sex (OR=22.5), side effects (OR=5.3), intestinal metaplasia (OR=6.7) and gastric atrophy (OR=6.8), while negatively with antritis (OR=0.15). However, at multivariate analysis, none of the cited variables was found statistically significant. Conclusion: Sequential therapy is safe in old patients and has satisfactory effectiveness, but an "a priori" model predicting the outcome based only on clinical data is not reliable.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/186662
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact