Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to discuss the role of communities of practice in organizations and theirmostbeneficialeffectsforbothindividualandcollectivedevelopment. Design/methodology/approach – Based on a literature review, from the first authoritative texts by LaveandWengeruntilthemostrecentcritiques,thepaperhasattemptedtoconciliatetheindividualandthe organizationalperspectivesaboutthisprecioustoolforknowledgemanagementandcreation. Findings – Because of their distinctive features, a joint enterprise, a mutual engagement and a shared repertoire,ifstrategicallymanaged,mightresorttoindividualandorganizationalpositiveoutcomes.Froman individualperspective,communitiescouldbebeneficialindevelopingprofessionalskills,astrongersenseof identity and finding continuity even during discontinuity and change. From an organizational perspective, communitiesofpracticecouldhelpdrivethestrategy,startnewlinesofbusiness,solveproblemsquicklyand transferbestpractices. Research limitations/implications – Many limitations about this conceptualization have been presented. Therefore, future research should try to focus on communities within different socio-cultural contextsandwithindifferentkindsoforganizations. Practical implications – Practical implications about the use of communities of practice within organizationalcontextsaremainlylinkedtotheenhancementofhumanandsocialcapitalseenasastrategic, althoughintangible,asset. Social implications – The social implications of this paper are connected to the contribution to the discussiononthethemewhichisquiteuncommoninhumanresourcemanagementresearch. Originality/value – Thevalueofthispaperistheattempttoconnectthecommunitiesofpracticetohuman andsocialcapital.

Managing Social and Human Capital in Organizations: Communities of Practices as Strategic Tools for Individual and Organizational Development

Manuti Amelia;
2017-01-01

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to discuss the role of communities of practice in organizations and theirmostbeneficialeffectsforbothindividualandcollectivedevelopment. Design/methodology/approach – Based on a literature review, from the first authoritative texts by LaveandWengeruntilthemostrecentcritiques,thepaperhasattemptedtoconciliatetheindividualandthe organizationalperspectivesaboutthisprecioustoolforknowledgemanagementandcreation. Findings – Because of their distinctive features, a joint enterprise, a mutual engagement and a shared repertoire,ifstrategicallymanaged,mightresorttoindividualandorganizationalpositiveoutcomes.Froman individualperspective,communitiescouldbebeneficialindevelopingprofessionalskills,astrongersenseof identity and finding continuity even during discontinuity and change. From an organizational perspective, communitiesofpracticecouldhelpdrivethestrategy,startnewlinesofbusiness,solveproblemsquicklyand transferbestpractices. Research limitations/implications – Many limitations about this conceptualization have been presented. Therefore, future research should try to focus on communities within different socio-cultural contextsandwithindifferentkindsoforganizations. Practical implications – Practical implications about the use of communities of practice within organizationalcontextsaremainlylinkedtotheenhancementofhumanandsocialcapitalseenasastrategic, althoughintangible,asset. Social implications – The social implications of this paper are connected to the contribution to the discussiononthethemewhichisquiteuncommoninhumanresourcemanagementresearch. Originality/value – Thevalueofthispaperistheattempttoconnectthecommunitiesofpracticetohuman andsocialcapital.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
JWL-07-2016-0062.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 179.84 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
179.84 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/184121
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 23
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 17
social impact