Purpose: To compare clinical outcomes of ORIF with volar locking plates and the Epibloc system (ES) in the treatment of distal radius fractures (DRFs) in patients aged over 65 years. Methods: We retrospectively examined a consecutive series of 100 patients with intra-articular or extra- articular DRF who were admitted to our Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology between January 2007 and January 2013. Fifty patients were treated using the Epibloc System; and the other 50 patients using ORIF with volar locking plates. In all patients, functional evaluation (wrist range of motion [ROM], grip strength and Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH] Score) and radiographic assessment (radial inclination, volar tilt, ulnar variance and articular congruity) were performed at 2 and 6 weeks, and 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively; then every 12 months thereafter. Results: ORIF with volar locking plates was associated with better outcome than ES in the intra-articular and extra-articular DRF groups, generating higher average ROM, DASH and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. Grip strength mean values, however, were quantified over the minimum level for a functional wrist ( > 60%) in both groups. There were no differences between the two techniques in X-ray parameters, and no further correlation was found with functional outcome and ROM. Conclusions: In a low-functioning patient with multiple medical comorbidities, minimally-invasive surgery with the ES is a safe option, enables early mobilisation of the wrist and is likely to produce acceptable clinical outcomes.

Volar locking plate vs epibloc system for distal radius fractures in the elderly

SOLARINO, Giuseppe;VICENTI, GIOVANNI;ABATE, ANTONELLA;CARROZZO, MASSIMILIANO;PICCA, GIROLAMO;COLELLA, ANTONIO;MORETTI, Biagio
2016-01-01

Abstract

Purpose: To compare clinical outcomes of ORIF with volar locking plates and the Epibloc system (ES) in the treatment of distal radius fractures (DRFs) in patients aged over 65 years. Methods: We retrospectively examined a consecutive series of 100 patients with intra-articular or extra- articular DRF who were admitted to our Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology between January 2007 and January 2013. Fifty patients were treated using the Epibloc System; and the other 50 patients using ORIF with volar locking plates. In all patients, functional evaluation (wrist range of motion [ROM], grip strength and Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH] Score) and radiographic assessment (radial inclination, volar tilt, ulnar variance and articular congruity) were performed at 2 and 6 weeks, and 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively; then every 12 months thereafter. Results: ORIF with volar locking plates was associated with better outcome than ES in the intra-articular and extra-articular DRF groups, generating higher average ROM, DASH and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. Grip strength mean values, however, were quantified over the minimum level for a functional wrist ( > 60%) in both groups. There were no differences between the two techniques in X-ray parameters, and no further correlation was found with functional outcome and ROM. Conclusions: In a low-functioning patient with multiple medical comorbidities, minimally-invasive surgery with the ES is a safe option, enables early mobilisation of the wrist and is likely to produce acceptable clinical outcomes.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2016 radius fractures.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 2.36 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.36 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/173007
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact