The purpose of this paper is to reconsider some features of Aristaenetus’ codex unicus Vindob. Phil. gr. 310 (such as the inscriptio, the readers and owners, the authorship of some medieval epigrams) and to provide new data about the manuscript tradition and reception of this author. In § 1 and § 2 I deal with medieval (Nicholas of Otranto, Palaganus) and humanistic (Janus Lascaris) readers and owners of this manuscript and with the inscriptio on the first leaf; in § 3 and § 4 I draw attention to a new Aristaenetus’ manuscript (written in the XVIIth century by the scholar Leone Allacci) and an hitherto unpublished Italian version made in 1701 by Girolamo Baruffaldi.
Appunti sulla tradizione manoscritta e la ricezione di Aristeneto
BIANCHI, NUNZIO
2008-01-01
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to reconsider some features of Aristaenetus’ codex unicus Vindob. Phil. gr. 310 (such as the inscriptio, the readers and owners, the authorship of some medieval epigrams) and to provide new data about the manuscript tradition and reception of this author. In § 1 and § 2 I deal with medieval (Nicholas of Otranto, Palaganus) and humanistic (Janus Lascaris) readers and owners of this manuscript and with the inscriptio on the first leaf; in § 3 and § 4 I draw attention to a new Aristaenetus’ manuscript (written in the XVIIth century by the scholar Leone Allacci) and an hitherto unpublished Italian version made in 1701 by Girolamo Baruffaldi.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
