To investigate the influence of various factors on the ability of primary school children (aged 6-9 years) to refer an event that occurred during their life. Materials and Methods. The factors analyzed were: the time since the event occurred; the role the child had in the event; the type of questions asked to elicit the account. Results. The results of this research indicate that 52.4% of 6-yearold children are able to describe the main elements of the event if they are allowed to give a free account. Asking direct questions does not improve the quality of the narrative. By contrast, in 9-year-old children the quantity of data collected is improved if direct questions are asked. A role as a participant in the event improves the quality of the child’s evidence but only in the group of children aged 9, whereas in younger children the difference is not significant. At the age of 9, the child’s resistance to leading questions is already quite good (40.7%), whereas children of 6 are much more suggestible. Conclusions. The Authors conclude this work by making some reflections on the possible use of these findings in Law Courts, and on the need for a highly specific training of experts involved in the task of collecting evidence from young children.

Child witnesses: A study of memory and suggestibility

GRATTAGLIANO, IGNAZIO;CARABELLESE, Felice Francesco;CATANESI, Roberto
2013-01-01

Abstract

To investigate the influence of various factors on the ability of primary school children (aged 6-9 years) to refer an event that occurred during their life. Materials and Methods. The factors analyzed were: the time since the event occurred; the role the child had in the event; the type of questions asked to elicit the account. Results. The results of this research indicate that 52.4% of 6-yearold children are able to describe the main elements of the event if they are allowed to give a free account. Asking direct questions does not improve the quality of the narrative. By contrast, in 9-year-old children the quantity of data collected is improved if direct questions are asked. A role as a participant in the event improves the quality of the child’s evidence but only in the group of children aged 9, whereas in younger children the difference is not significant. At the age of 9, the child’s resistance to leading questions is already quite good (40.7%), whereas children of 6 are much more suggestible. Conclusions. The Authors conclude this work by making some reflections on the possible use of these findings in Law Courts, and on the need for a highly specific training of experts involved in the task of collecting evidence from young children.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
child witnessess clinica terapeutica.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 124.79 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
124.79 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/130512
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact