Most of the research on text categorization has focused on classifying text documents into a set of categories with no structural relationships among them (flat classification). However, in many information repositories documents are organized in a hierarchy of categories to support a thematic search by browsing topics of interests. The consideration of the hierarchical relationship among categories opens several additional issues in the development of methods for automated document classification. Questions concern the representation of documents, the learning process, the classification process and the evaluation criteria of experimental results. They are systematically investigated in this paper, whose main contribution is a general hierarchical text categorization framework where the hierarchy of categories is involved in all phases of automated document classification, namely feature selection, learning and classification of a new document. An automated threshold determination method for classification scores is embedded in the proposed framework. It can be applied to any classifier that returns a degree of membership of a document to a category. In this work three learning methods are considered for the construction of document classifiers, namely centroid-based, naïve Bayes and SVM. The proposed framework has been implemented in the system WebClassIII and has been tested on three datasets (Yahoo, DMOZ, RCV1) which present a variety of situations in terms of hierarchical structure. Experimental results are reported and several conclusions are drawn on the comparison of the flat vs. the hierarchical approach as well as on the comparison of different hierarchical classifiers. The paper concludes with a review of related work and a discussion of previous findings vs. our findings.

Classifying Web Documents in a Hierarchy of Categories: A Comprehensive Study

CECI, MICHELANGELO;MALERBA, Donato
2007

Abstract

Most of the research on text categorization has focused on classifying text documents into a set of categories with no structural relationships among them (flat classification). However, in many information repositories documents are organized in a hierarchy of categories to support a thematic search by browsing topics of interests. The consideration of the hierarchical relationship among categories opens several additional issues in the development of methods for automated document classification. Questions concern the representation of documents, the learning process, the classification process and the evaluation criteria of experimental results. They are systematically investigated in this paper, whose main contribution is a general hierarchical text categorization framework where the hierarchy of categories is involved in all phases of automated document classification, namely feature selection, learning and classification of a new document. An automated threshold determination method for classification scores is embedded in the proposed framework. It can be applied to any classifier that returns a degree of membership of a document to a category. In this work three learning methods are considered for the construction of document classifiers, namely centroid-based, naïve Bayes and SVM. The proposed framework has been implemented in the system WebClassIII and has been tested on three datasets (Yahoo, DMOZ, RCV1) which present a variety of situations in terms of hierarchical structure. Experimental results are reported and several conclusions are drawn on the comparison of the flat vs. the hierarchical approach as well as on the comparison of different hierarchical classifiers. The paper concludes with a review of related work and a discussion of previous findings vs. our findings.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11586/126058
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 82
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 54
social impact