Soluble CD4 antigen (sCD4) was measured in seven commercially available intravenous immunoglobulin preparations (IVIg) by means of a double determinant immunoassay (DDIA), whereby two MoAbs recognizing two distinct and spatially distant epitopes on CD4 were used to capture and detect the antigen, respectively. Preincubation of six out of seven IVIg, which were found to be apparently positive for sCD4, with mouse- and bovine-derived serum or purified immunoglobulins completely neutralized DDIA reactivity for sCD4. The inhibition was specific since it was not or only partially observed when IVIg were mixed with whole serum or purified IgG from rabbit. Extensive absorption of six IVIg on insolubilized mouse IgG (mIgG) resulted in a complete loss of reactivity. Eluted human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA) from any of the IVIg displayed a dose-dependent binding in a DDIA, though its extent varied from one preparation to another. Western blot analysis showed that HAMA from all IVIg contained no component with a molecular weight identical with or close to that of recombinant CD4. Purified mIgG markedly influenced the sCD4 reactivity of two IVIg (Sandoglobulin and Globuman I.V.) when sCD4 was measured with a purchased 'CD4-specific Test Kit', thus suggesting that HAMA can exceed the absorbing capacity of the sample diluent. Taken as a whole, these data indicate that sCD4-based DDIA signal is mostly, if not completely, generated by the presence of human immunoglobulin with anti-mouse immunoglobulin reactivity, thus casting doubts on the actual occurrence of sCD4 in IVIg.
Soluble CD4 antigen reactivity in intravenous immunoglobulin preparations: is it specific?
PEROSA, Federico
;RIZZI, Rita;
1995-01-01
Abstract
Soluble CD4 antigen (sCD4) was measured in seven commercially available intravenous immunoglobulin preparations (IVIg) by means of a double determinant immunoassay (DDIA), whereby two MoAbs recognizing two distinct and spatially distant epitopes on CD4 were used to capture and detect the antigen, respectively. Preincubation of six out of seven IVIg, which were found to be apparently positive for sCD4, with mouse- and bovine-derived serum or purified immunoglobulins completely neutralized DDIA reactivity for sCD4. The inhibition was specific since it was not or only partially observed when IVIg were mixed with whole serum or purified IgG from rabbit. Extensive absorption of six IVIg on insolubilized mouse IgG (mIgG) resulted in a complete loss of reactivity. Eluted human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA) from any of the IVIg displayed a dose-dependent binding in a DDIA, though its extent varied from one preparation to another. Western blot analysis showed that HAMA from all IVIg contained no component with a molecular weight identical with or close to that of recombinant CD4. Purified mIgG markedly influenced the sCD4 reactivity of two IVIg (Sandoglobulin and Globuman I.V.) when sCD4 was measured with a purchased 'CD4-specific Test Kit', thus suggesting that HAMA can exceed the absorbing capacity of the sample diluent. Taken as a whole, these data indicate that sCD4-based DDIA signal is mostly, if not completely, generated by the presence of human immunoglobulin with anti-mouse immunoglobulin reactivity, thus casting doubts on the actual occurrence of sCD4 in IVIg.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
