Objective: The aim of this study was to report the effect on tolerability of combined treatment with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVT) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin in patients with stage II retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP) who had been treated previously with PDT and presented with recurrent RAP (R-RAP). Methods: This was a retrospective case series of patients with R-RAP after PDT (1–5 treatments) treated once with IVT followed 1 month later by PDT. A visual acuity test, fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography, and optical coherence tomography were performed at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months. Results: Five patients (4 men, 1 woman; mean [SD] age, 76.8 [3.9] years) with 6 eyes diagnosed with stage II R-RAP who had previously been treated with PDT and who received an IVT injection and PDT within 1 month were included in the study. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) remained stable after IVT in 5 eyes (83%) and deteriorated in 1 eye (17%). After PDT, BCVA remained stable in 2 eyes (33%) and deteriorated in 4 eyes (67%). IVT treatment combined with PDT also reduced fluorescein leakage. Median lesion size increased 24% before PDT and 61% at 6 months after PDT. One eye had intraocular hypertension at 3 months, and 1 eye developed a pigment epithelial tear after PDT. Conclusion: The results were limited by the number of eyes and relatively short follow-up, but in this study, PDT after IVT did not appear to be as effective or well tolerated in 5 patients who had already been treated with PDT and presented with R-RAP.
TREATMENT OF RECURRENT RETINAL ANGIOMATOUS PROLIFERATION WITH INTRAVITREAL TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE FOLLOWED BY PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY WITH VERTEPORFIN: A RETROSPECTIVE CASE SERIES
ALESSIO, Giovanni
2009-01-01
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to report the effect on tolerability of combined treatment with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVT) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin in patients with stage II retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP) who had been treated previously with PDT and presented with recurrent RAP (R-RAP). Methods: This was a retrospective case series of patients with R-RAP after PDT (1–5 treatments) treated once with IVT followed 1 month later by PDT. A visual acuity test, fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography, and optical coherence tomography were performed at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months. Results: Five patients (4 men, 1 woman; mean [SD] age, 76.8 [3.9] years) with 6 eyes diagnosed with stage II R-RAP who had previously been treated with PDT and who received an IVT injection and PDT within 1 month were included in the study. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) remained stable after IVT in 5 eyes (83%) and deteriorated in 1 eye (17%). After PDT, BCVA remained stable in 2 eyes (33%) and deteriorated in 4 eyes (67%). IVT treatment combined with PDT also reduced fluorescein leakage. Median lesion size increased 24% before PDT and 61% at 6 months after PDT. One eye had intraocular hypertension at 3 months, and 1 eye developed a pigment epithelial tear after PDT. Conclusion: The results were limited by the number of eyes and relatively short follow-up, but in this study, PDT after IVT did not appear to be as effective or well tolerated in 5 patients who had already been treated with PDT and presented with R-RAP.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
